Krzysztof Riedl specializes in civil law, privacy protection and constitutional law.
He advises clients in litigations and arbitrations. He represents air carriers in litigations regarding passengers’ claims relating to cancelled or delayed flights.
His practice covers personal data protection, including implementation of GDPR. He conducts data processing audits, prepares complete data processing documentation, negotiates agreements on outsourcing of data processing and evaluates the technical and organizational measures taken by businesses to ensure data safety. He also conducts trainings and workshops on GDPR.
Experience and Education
Krzysztof Riedl has worked with Łaszczuk & Partners since 2015.
Since 2017, he has been the research fellow at the Institute of Law Studies of the Polish Academy of Science in the project “Roadmap to European effective Justice (RE-Jus): judicial training ensuring effective redress to fundamental rights violations”, realized within a grant from the European Commission.
Krzysztof is a doctoral student at the Department of Civil Law at the University of Warsaw and a trainee at the Warsaw Regional Chamber of Legal Advisers. He also cooperates with INPRIS Institute for Law and Society. He is a 2015 honours graduate of the Faculty of Law and Administration at the University of Warsaw. In the 2014/2015 academic year he studied at the University of Munich under the Erasmus program.
In 2016, he won the 1st prize in 3rd Competition for the best master thesis in the field of civil procedure for the academic year 2014/2015, organized by the Civil Procedure Scientific Society.
In 2016, together with a team which included Anita Garnuszek, won the 1st place in in the 5th edition of Lewiatan Arbitration Moot. The team won also second prize for the best statement of claim.
Incidental Shortening of the Present Term of the Public Authorities (remarks in view of principles of tenure and independence), [in:] Meanders of Democratic State Ruled by Law, M. Zubik, F. Dymitrowski (ed.), Warsaw 2017
The significance of the Constitutional Tribunal’s resolutions on universally binding interpretation of acts for administrative courts’ case-law after 1997 [Original title: Znaczenie uchwał Trybunału Konstytucyjnego, ustalających powszechnie obowiązującą wykładnię ustaw, dla orzecznictwa sądów administracyjnych po 1997 r.], Zeszyty Naukowe Sądownictwa Administracyjnego 2017, No. 2
Appointments under Civic Control. Appointments of the judges of the Constitutional Tribunal, the Inspector General for Personal Data Protection, the Ombudsman and the Prosecutor General. Report from monitoring
Religia jako granica wolności wypowiedzi – porównanie standardów na tle Konstytucji RP a Europejskiej Konwencji [Religion as a limit of freedom of expression – comparison between standards in the context of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland and the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms] [in:] Konflikty wartości? O wolności wypowiedzi i religii (Conflicts of values? On freedom of expression and religion), ed. J. Biesiadzińska, P. Kalinowski & M. Nocuń